Multi-layer
PE Films:
A Critical
Component in Flexible Packaging
P.
P. Kharas
Chairman & Managing Director
Ecoplast Ltd., Mumbai.
The
development of the “hot-tack” concept and equipment for its measurement
in the laboratory brought a measure of relief to the film supplier.
Introduction
Multi-layer
Polyethylene (PE) films produced by the “Blown Co-extrusion Process”
was first introduced in India around 1978, for packaging of milk by
the Maharashtra Government Milk Scheme and the National Dairy Development
Board. Very few people realized at that time, that the advent of the
multilayer PE film would revolutionize the growth of the Flexible
Packaging Industry (FPI).
The
Flexible Packaging Industry in the context of this article, predominantly
refers to the Converting or Laminating industry, which uses PE films
for lamination with one or more substrates such as: polyester film,
bi-axial PP film, cast PP film, often in combinations with Aluminum
foil depending upon the package requirements. The PE film forms the
innermost layer – the heatseal layer – of the laminate and is in contact
with the product packed.
In
the early eighties, Imperial Chemical Industries was the main supplier
of cast mono-layer PE films to the FPI. These film rolls apart from
being small (about 250 mm) in diameter had several disadvantages,
particularly with respect to their ability to maintain seal integrity
on vertical form-fill seal lines.
The
multilayer PE film gave the FPI several advantages:
-
You could tailor different properties on each side of the film;
for example one side for adhesive lamination and the other side
for machinability on the packaging line.
-
You could have a combination properties hitherto not possible monolayer
films.
-
You could reduce the cost of high performance co-polymers by reducing
the thickness to the optimum level required for the application,
while the other layers were made up of lower priced commodity polymer,
to provide bulk or desired thickness of the film.
As
it happens with all pioneering efforts, the accumulated knowledge
and experience was scarce, on designing a film structure for a specific
application.
Each
entity in the supply chain, shown below, gave their own version on
the type and thickness of the film, that would work; while the end-user
made little or no effort to define the performance requirements of
the film, or laminate. In this scenario, the PE film supplier was
invariably the target for package failures.
During
this evolutionary phase, the raw material suppliers saw an opportunity
to promote their PE grades with end-users, which led to the end-user
specifying the grade to the Convertor who in turn, specified the raw
material to the film supplier. The most important aspect of specifying
the film or laminate performance for pack integrity, was still some
distance away, in the thinking process.
Atleast
one film supplier believed that this approach to developing film structures
was not appropriate in providing value to the customer. They began
to study each package failure, as it emerged and to determine its
root cause. Over the early and mid-nineties, this Company had accumulated
a pile of information, which was systematically arranged, to help
development of film structures, for various packaging applications.
While
this evolutionary process was on, a technical paper titled “Blown
Film Bubble Forming and Quenching Effects on Film Properties”, by
Butler and Patel of Dow Plastics, provided the evidence needed to
convince end-users that specifying raw materials was not the solution.
....contd.
TO
READ FURTHER... SUBSCRIBE TO
YOUR COPY TODAY!!!